Translate this page into:
Methotrexate in refractory chronic urticaria
*Corresponding author: Vitorino Modesto dos Santos, Department of Medicine, Armed Forces Hospital and Catholic University, Brasília-DF, Brazil. vitorinomodesto@gmail.com.
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: Santos VM, Sugai TA. Methotrexate in refractory chronic urticarial. Indian J Skin Allergy. 2024;3:147-8. doi: 10.25259/IJSA_15_2024
Dear Editor,
Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) may become refractory chronic refractory urticaria (CRU) to first-generation antihistamines even with up to 4-fold the usual dosage, increasing the disease burden; one option is to use methotrexate (MTX) plus the second-generation antihistamines.[1-6] MTX may affect the bone marrow causing pancytopenia and the oral and gastrointestinal epithelial cells, with the development of mucositis and hemorrhagic ulcerations.[7-10] MTX adverse effects are usually of low or moderate intensity, but the cumulative levels in cases of renal dysfunction favors the overdose toxicity and more severe outcome.[7-10]
We would like to emphasize the very recent article of this Journal by Yadav AK, describing the outcomes of 46 patients with mean age of 32.6 (± 9.68) years and CSU, who underwent oral MTX (15 mg weekly) plus folic acid, and the oral desloratadine (5 mg twice daily); there was a reduced urticaria activity and enhanced life quality index.[6] The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of MTX oral pulse to manage patients with CRU; although longer periods with placebo-controlled studies are needed, the results indicated that MTX can be a safe effective option to treat patients who have CSU without response to elevated doses of second-generation antihistamines. With no severe adverse effect, only slightly elevated transaminases occurred in 15% of cases.[6] The author concluded that MTX is a safe, well-tolerated, and effective option to treat CSU cases that do not respond to elevated doses of second-generation antihistamines.[6] The results of the study show a promising, economical, and simplified therapeutic advance; notwithstanding, it seems opportune to call special attention to the eventual occurrence of adverse effects that have been described even in patients utilizing low MTX dosage.[7-10] Clinical manifestations of toxicity include oral and gastrointestinal ulcerations, rash, alopecia, anaphylaxis, pancytopenia, immunosuppression, and lung or liver fibrosis.[7-10] Potentially, toxic MTX level varies according to the time of last drug ingestion, ranging from over than 10.00 µmoL/L in 24 h, and 1.00 µmoL/L in 48 h, till 0.20 µmoL/L in 72 h. High doses can be by logistical mistake or accidental excessive MTX ingestion.[9] An ingestion of MTX up to 25 mg per week is considered a low dose of the medicament. We would like to emphasize on the need to enhance the suspicion index among healthcare workers about a possible unsuspected or underdiagnosed low-dose toxicity evolving without early control.[9] Special care must be taken in case of patients with some cognitive or visual deficits, who should not be in charge of controlling their weekly routine medication-taking schedules. They may also have difficulty interpreting and/or reporting symptoms to their caregivers. In conclusion, the option of utilizing MTX to better control the refractory cases of urticaria should be welcome, because this surely will benefit a large number of patients; however, an accurate follow-up must be employed to actively search for adverse effects.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation
The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.
References
- The KAAACI/KDA evidence-based practice guidelines for chronic spontaneous urticaria in Korean adults and children: Part 2. Management of H1-antihistamine-refractory chronic urticaria. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2020;12:750-70.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chronic spontaneous urticaria refractory to cyclosporine add-on omalizumab successfully treated with methotrexate add-on. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33:e14469.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The therapeutic role of methotrexate in chronic urticaria: A systematic review. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2022;88:313-21.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Efficacy of drug therapies in antihistamine refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria: Real life data. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol 2021 doi: 10.12932/AP-270820-0948
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Safety of methotrexate in chronic urticaria unresponsive to omalizumab. Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021;20:500-4.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Study of effectiveness of methotrexate oral pulse in refractory chronic urticaria. Indian J Skin Allergy. 2024;3:66-70.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Methotrexate intoxication: Diagnostic difficulty case report. . 2021;43(Suppl 1):S47-8.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Management options for low-dose methotrexate-induced oral ulcers: A systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019;24:e181-9.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Low-dose methotrexate toxicity leading to pancytopenia: Leucovorin as a rescue treatment. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2024;37:339-43.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Methotrexate-induced mucositis: A consequence of medication error in a rheumatoid arthritis patient. Cureus. 2023;15:e46290.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]