Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’s reply
Book Review
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Conference Report
Editorial
Image
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media and News
Obituary
Original Article
Patient’s Corner – Random Musing
Pharmacology and Therapy
Resident’s Corner
Review Article
Symposium
Symposium - Pediatric Eczema
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’s reply
Book Review
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Conference Report
Editorial
Image
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media and News
Obituary
Original Article
Patient’s Corner – Random Musing
Pharmacology and Therapy
Resident’s Corner
Review Article
Symposium
Symposium - Pediatric Eczema
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’s reply
Book Review
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Conference Report
Editorial
Image
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media and News
Obituary
Original Article
Patient’s Corner – Random Musing
Pharmacology and Therapy
Resident’s Corner
Review Article
Symposium
Symposium - Pediatric Eczema
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Symposium – Pediatric Eczema
5 (
1
); 9-16
doi:
10.25259/IJSA_26_2025

Topical therapy in the management of pediatric eczema: Evidence-based review

Department of Dermatology, Institute of Medical Sciences and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

*Corresponding author: Abhipsa Samal, Department of Dermatology, Institute of Medical Sciences and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. samal.abhipsa@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Dixit N, Varma SM, Samal A. Topical therapy in the management of pediatric eczema: Evidence-based review. Indian J Skin Allergy. 2026;5:9-16. doi: 10.25259/IJSA_26_2025

Abstract

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder marked by recurrent flares and remissions, with intense and persistent pruritus and variable clinical presentation. The primary therapeutic objectives are to reduce skin lesions, minimize flare-ups, and decrease overall disease burden. Topical corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors remain central to topical management in pediatric AD. However, due to long-term side effects, continuous use is not recommended. Hence, recent advancements have shifted toward novel and targeted topical therapies, which show potential in improving disease outcomes in mild-to-moderate AD. Nevertheless, long-term, large-scale studies are essential to fully assess their safety and efficacy. This consensus document aims to update the general management and upcoming therapies in pediatric AD.

Keywords

Atopic dermatitis
Janus Kinase inhibitors
Pediatric
Phosphodiesterase inhibitors
Topical treatment

INTRODUCTION

Atopic dermatitis (AD), commonly known as eczema, is a chronic, relapsing inflammatory condition characterized by dry, scaly patches and plaques. In childhood, it predominantly affects the extensor surfaces. Although AD can occur at any age, it typically presents in early childhood and often resolves by adolescence or adulthood. The exact pathophysiology remains unclear but involves a complex interplay of factors, including skin barrier dysfunction, immune dysregulation, and genetic and environmental influences.[1]

Clinically, AD presents with excessively dry skin and pruritic, eczematous lesions that appear in age-specific locations. In acute phases, lesions may ooze and exude, while chronic phases often lead to lichenification. The primary goal of management is to address the barrier defect, control inflammation, and restore the skin microbiome.

Topical therapies remain the cornerstone of treatment due to their targeted anti-inflammatory effects, cost-effectiveness, and lower risk of adverse effects compared to systemic medications. Moisturizers, corticosteroids, and calcineurin inhibitors are commonly used to maintain hydration and reduce inflammation. In addition, identifying and avoiding triggers, maintaining proper skin care, and educating patients on long-term management are essential components of treatment. Effective management can significantly improve the quality of life for individuals with AD.

Emollients

Moisturizers and emollients play a crucial role in improving barrier function, providing adequate hydration, reducing skin inflammation, decreasing the frequency of flares, and minimizing the need for topical corticosteroids (TCS). They also help maintain clinical remission achieved with other active treatments. Therefore, emollients are recommended for all cases of AD, regardless of severity or disease activity. They typically contain humectants, such as urea or glycerol, which promote hydration of the stratum corneum, and occlusives, such as lipids or petrolatum, which reduce water evaporation.[2] Prescription emollient devices (PEDs) are specialized topical formulations designed to restore the skin barrier in AD by mimicking the natural lipid composition of the stratum corneum. They often contain:

  1. Physiologic lipids (ceramides, cholesterol, and free fatty acids) in optimal ratios (3:1:1)

  2. Anti-inflammatory agents (e.g., furfuryl palmitate and antioxidants)

  3. Non-steroidal and non-immunosuppressive components.

Hebert (2022) conducted a real-world, post-marketing surveillance study evaluating a furfuryl palmitate-containing PED in 134 patients (pediatric to adult) with atopic or contact dermatitis over 28 days. The study reported a treatment success rate of 87.5%, with pruritus improving in 90.6%, skin irritation in 91.3%, and dryness in 90.9% of patients.[3]

Ceramides

Ceramides are lipid molecules that make up a major component of stratum corneum and are essential for maintaining the skin’s barrier function and preventing transepidermal water loss (TEWL). In individuals with AD, ceramide levels are significantly reduced, leading to impaired barrier function, increased skin dryness, and susceptibility to allergens and irritants. This deficiency contributes to inflammation, pruritus, and the chronic-relapsing nature of the disease.

Topical formulations containing ceramides have been developed to restore the skin barrier and are now considered a key part of maintenance therapy in AD. These ceramide-based moisturizers replenish lost lipids, reduce TEWL, and improve hydration, thereby reducing flare-ups, the need for TCS, and extending the period of remission.

A systematic review and meta-analysis by Nugroho et al. (2023) analyzed five articles, which evaluated the efficacy of ceramide-containing moisturizers compared to other moisturizers in managing AD.[4] Ceramide-containing moisturizers demonstrated a statistically significantly greater reduction in SCORing AD (SCORAD) scores. The mean difference was -0.98 (95% CI: -1.63 to -0.33; p = 0.003), indicating enhanced efficacy in reducing AD severity.[4] Overall, ceramides offer a safe, effective, and steroid-sparing option in the long-term management of AD.[5]

Cleansing

Cleansing should be a routine part of AD care, particularly in cases with prominent oozing. For crusted lesions, the skin should be gently cleansed to remove crusts, allergens, and contaminants. Non-irritant, non-allergenic products that help preserve skin barrier function and maintain optimal pH (5.5-6) and lipid metabolism are recommended. Non-soap aqueous cleansers or syndets are preferred. Daily short baths lasting less than 5 minutes using lukewarm water, followed by gentle drying with a soft cloth, are ideal.

Emollients should be applied immediately afterward while the skin is still damp to lock in moisture and enhance barrier repair [Table 1].[6]

Table 1: Bathing instructions in atopic dermatitis.
Step Instructions
1. Daily bathing Recommended; helps hydrate and cleanse skin
2. Water temperature Use lukewarm water (NOT hot)
3. Duration Limit bath to 5-10 minutes
4. Cleanser type Use mild, fragrance-free cleansers (preferably non-soap/syndet-based)
5. Cleansing method Avoid scrubbing; perform gentle cleansing only
6. Drying Pat dry with a soft towel (avoid rubbing)
7. Moisturization Apply emollient/moisturizer within 3 minutes (“soak and smear” method); prefer ceramide-based or PED-formulated moisturizers
8. Bath additives Consider bath oils or bleach baths (especially if recurrent infections are present)

PED: Prescription emollient devices

Bleach bath

Bathing in dilute bleach (sodium hypochlorite; NaOCl) is a common adjunctive treatment for AD. Administration of this treatment includes 1/4 to 1/2 cup of 5% to 6% bleach in a full bathtub (~40 gallons of water) for a final concentration of ~0.005%, applied for 10 minutes, 2-3 times per week. Ensure the bath duration does not exceed 10 minutes. Rinse thoroughly with fresh water afterward and apply moisturizer immediately.

By reducing the Staphylococcus aureus colonization, which is a common bacterium that exacerbates the inflammation in AD, it helps to:

  1. Decrease inflammation triggered by bacterial toxins and superantigens

  2. Improve skin barrier function by reducing bacterial-induced skin damage

  3. Reduce flare frequency and severity of AD.[7,8]

Wet wrap therapy

Wet wrap therapy is a useful treatment approach for moderate-to-severe AD. It involves the application of layers of bandages or cotton over topical medications, offering cooling, anti-inflammatory, and antipruritic effects. This method enhances skin hydration and provides a protective barrier against external allergens. Two standardized techniques are commonly followed. The first is the double-layer wet wrap, where an inner wet layer and an outer dry layer are applied over a topical cream or ointment. The second method involves applying diluted corticosteroids to the inner layer, followed by a dry outer layer. Both techniques typically begin with a 10-15-minutes bath and are recommended to be performed 2-3 times daily. While wet wrap therapy is effective, it can be time-consuming and requires thorough education for caregivers or parents. Potential drawbacks include skin maceration, folliculitis, and the risk of local or systemic corticosteroid side effects, especially if steroidimpregnated wraps are used for prolonged periods.[9]

TCS

The selection of TCS depends on disease severity and the area affected. Mid-to-high potency steroids are preferred, while super-potent corticosteroids are avoided in pediatric patients due to the risk of adverse effects. A daily application at night over hydrated skin is recommended, with gradual tapering to prevent withdrawal or rebound disease.[10,11,12]

TCS treatment follows two approaches: Reactive and proactive. In reactive therapy, TCS is applied only to lesional skin and tapered quickly after clearance. In proactive therapy, after acute flares are controlled, TCS is continued twice a week on previously affected areas, while daily emollient use is maintained on normal skin to prevent recurrence [Table 2].

Table 2: Topical corticosteroids in pediatric atopic dermatitis.
Potency Examples Indications Recommended age Duration
Low (Class VI-VII) Hydrocortisone 1% Mild AD, face, folds, infants ≥3 months Safe for daily use on delicate areas
Hydrocortisone acetate 0.5–1% Diaper area, mild flares ≥3 months Short courses; avoid long-term use
Moderate (Class IV-V) Desonide 0.05% Face, neck, folds, mild-moderate AD ≥3 months Safer alternative to potent TCS on sensitive sites
Fluticasone propionate
0.05%
Trunk/extremities, moderate AD ≥4 months (cream) Use once daily
Mometasone furoate 0.1% Trunk/extremities, moderate AD ≥2 years Potent-less duration on thinner skin
High (Class II-III) Betamethasone valerate 0.1% Severe AD flares, lichenified plaques ≥12 years (limited in <12y) Use short-term (1–2 weeks), not for face/folds
Triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% Chronic lichenified lesions ≥6 years Limit to thickened skin, up to 2 weeks
Very High (Class I) Clobetasol propionate 0.05% Severe flares, resistant AD ≥12 years Maximum 2 weeks; not for face, folds

AD: Atopic dermatitis, TCS: Topical corticosteroids

TOPICAL CALCINEURIN INHIBITORS (TCIS)

TCIs such as tacrolimus ointment and pimecrolimus cream are approved for the treatment of atopic eczema. Tacrolimus 0.03% and pimecrolimus 1% are approved for patients aged ≥2 years. Tacrolimus 0.1 % is approved for patients aged ≥16 years. TCIs are preferred over corticosteroids for the face and other sensitive areas due to their lower penetration, attributed to their molecular weight. They also have a lower risk of long-term side effects, such as skin atrophy, which is commonly associated with TCS. However, an initial stinging or burning sensation is a common side effect. Hence, TCSs are preferred over TCIs for managing acute flares in other areas of the body.

EMERGING THERAPIES

Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors

JAK inhibitors are a class of intracellular tyrosine kinase inhibitors that target JAK 1, 2, 3, and TYK2, acting by inhibiting the JAK-STAT signaling pathway. They have shown promise in the treatment of AD by reducing inflammation and improving skin barrier function.

Delgocitinib

Delgocitinib is the first topical pan-JAK inhibitor studied in AD. It works by inhibiting the activation of various inflammatory cells, including B- and T-cells, while also improving barrier function. Three randomized phase 3 trials have been conducted till date for evaluating the safety and efficacy of this drug. One of the studies (JapicCTI-184064), conducted on 2-5 5-year-old patients, showed improvement in modified eczema area and severity index (mEASI). mEASI 50 and mEASI 75 were achieved by 50.7% and 37.7% of the patients, respectively, in the first 4 weeks. Improvement in mEASI, Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA), and pruritus numeric rating scale (NRS) scores were maintained through week 56.[13] Adverse events were generally mild, with nasopharyngitis being the most common, followed by local side effects such as folliculitis and acne.

Ruxolitinib

Ruxolitinib is a first-generation, potent JAK 1/2 inhibitor currently FDA-approved for topical use in patients aged >12 years with mild-to-moderate chronic AD who are not immunocompromised. It primarily inhibits IL-33, Th2 proteins, and interferon-induced transmembrane protein 3. The drug is available as a 0.75% and 1.5% cream. A large phase 3 trial with both the formulations showed improvement of 40-50% in IGA score with 0.75% cream and around 50% improvement with 1.5% cream at week 8. EASI75 was achieved by around 50% of the patients on 0.75% cream, and around 60% on 1.5% cream. The adverse effects were mild, with the most common being a burning sensation, upper respiratory tract infections, nasopharyngitis, and influenza.[14]

Tofacitinib

Tofacitinib is a JAK 1/3 inhibitor evaluated in a phase 2a randomized trial in adults for mild-to-moderate AD. Th2 immune response is central in pathogenesis of AD, and IL-4 is the key cytokine involved in Th2 differentiation. JAK 1/3 inhibition caused a decrease in IL-4, thereby decreasing the Th2 immunity and causing improvement of the disease.[8] After 4 weeks of treatment, an improvement in EASI scores of 81.7% was observed compared to the vehicle. Additionally, improvements in the physician’s global assessment and body surface area (BSA) scores were noted after 3 months of use. Its safety profile was comparable to other drugs in the JAK inhibitor group.[15]

Brepocitinib

Brepocitinib, a JAK 1/TYK2 inhibitor, was tested in a large-scale phase 2 study in patients with mild-to-moderate AD. It is available in 0.1%, 0.3%, 1%, and 3% cream formulations and was tried once and twice daily regimens. Improvements in EASI by around 70% and IGA scores by 29.7-44% were observed after 6 weeks of treatment.[16]

Other JAK Inhibitors

Newer agents, such as ATI-1777, are soft JAK inhibitors that exert their effect only at the site of application and undergo rapid metabolism in systemic circulation, minimizing systemic exposure. These are currently in phase 2 trials, and a 74.4% reduction in mEASI in the drug group has been reported with no adverse events to date.[17]

Ifidancitinib, a JAK 1/3 inhibitor, has completed phase 2 trials in patients over 18 years with moderate to severe AD. However, its use in pediatric patients has not yet been established.[18] JAK inhibitors currently being tried in pediatric AD are shown in Table 3.

Table 3: Topical JAK inhibitors in pediatric atopic dermatitis.
Name Selectitivity Age Regimens
Delgocitinib Pan JAK Approved for 2–15 years; moderate-to-severe AD 0.25% twice daily
Ruxolitinib JAK ½ On trial for 2–12 years, approved for >12 years; mild-to-moderate AD 1.5% twice daily
Brepocitinib JAK1, TYK2 Phase 2 trials; 12–75 years; mild-to-moderate AD 0.1,0.3,1,3% twice daily
Ivarmacitinib JAK 1 Phase 3 trial; >12 years; mild-to-moderate 0.5,1,2% twice daily

JAK: Janus kinase inhibitors, AD: Atopic dermatitis

Phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) inhibitors

PDE4 inhibitors have recently emerged as a promising treatment for AD. They primarily act by increasing cyclic adenosine monophosphate levels, which negatively regulate pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, IL-13, and prostaglandin E2, all of which play a role in AD pathogenesis.

Crisaborole

Crisaborole is the first topical PDE4 inhibitor approved by the FDA for the treatment of mild-to-moderate AD in children aged 3 months and older. Clinical trials have demonstrated around 30% improvement in pruritus and ISGA scores, along with a favorable safety profile.[19] The most commonly reported adverse effects include localized pain and a burning sensation at the application site.

Other PDE4 inhibitors

Topical roflumilast 0.15% cream has been evaluated in pediatric patients with AD and has shown significant improvement in pruritus, as evidenced by reductions in the NRS score. Further studies are needed to establish its long-term efficacy and safety.[20] Various PDE4 inhibitors that are currently being used in pediatric AD are shown in Table 4.[21,22]

Table 4: Topical PDE4 inhibitors in pediatric AD.
Name Phase Age Regimen
Crisabarole Approved > 3 months 2% twice daily
Difamilast III 15–70 years 1% twice daily
Roflumilast II 3 months–17 years under trial 0.05% and 0.15% twice daily

PDE4: Phosphodiesterase-4, AD: Atopic dermatitis

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) agonists

AhRs are highly expressed in the skin and play a crucial role in epidermal differentiation by upregulating proteins such as filaggrin and involucrin. Activation of these receptors helps maintain skin barrier function, homeostasis, and the skin’s response to external factors.[23]

Tapinarof

Tapinarof is a novel AhR agonist with additional antioxidant properties. It also inhibits interleukins IL-17 and IL-22, which are involved in inflammation. A large-scale randomized controlled trial was conducted in patients aged 12-65 years with mild-to-moderate AD. The study evaluated the efficacy of 0.5% and 1% tapinarof cream. Around 50% improvement in IGA score in the 1% cream group and around 30% in the 0.5% group was observed after 3 months of treatment. EASI75 was higher (around 50-60%) in both groups.[24]

Adverse effects were reported in approximately half of the patients, with nasopharyngitis being the most common. Less frequent side effects included folliculitis, acne, and disease flare-ups. Some patients experienced transient elevations in liver enzymes and electrocardiogram changes, which resolved following treatment. Overall, tapinarof appears to be a promising topical therapy for AD, offering a novel mechanism of action with a favorable efficacy and safety profile.[25]

Transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) antagonists

TRPV1 receptors play a crucial role in pruritus, barrier function, and inflammation. These receptors are overexpressed in AD lesions, where they contribute to the release of inflammatory molecules that exacerbate itching and skin irritation.[26]

Asivatrep

Asivatrep, a TRPV1 antagonist, has demonstrated significant efficacy in managing AD symptoms. A phase 3 clinical study conducted in patients aged 12-70 years reported substantial improvement in IGA score by around 40% and EASI score by around 50% after 8 weeks of treatment. Adverse effects were minimal, with nasopharyngitis being the most common, similar to other topical agents. Importantly, no serious adverse events were reported, making asivatrep a promising new option for AD treatment.[27]

Skin microbiome modulators

Cutaneous dysbiosis, or the imbalance of skin microbiota, is a hallmark of AD. Patients with AD often exhibit an overgrowth of S. aureus and a decreased presence of beneficial bacterial species. This microbial imbalance has been associated with more severe disease manifestations, elevated IgE levels, eosinophil counts, and lactate dehydrogenase levels, all of which contribute to disease exacerbation.[28,29]

Roseomonas mucosa

Roseomonas mucosa, a Gram-negative bacterium commonly found in healthy skin, has been investigated for its role in restoring microbial balance. In a study involving children aged 9-14 years, twice-weekly topical application of Roseomonas mucosa resulted in significant improvements in SCORAD scores and pruritus symptoms. Reported adverse effects were mild, making it a promising adjunct therapy for AD.[30]

Other microbiome-based therapies

Other beneficial bacterial species, including Staphylococcus hominis and Nitrosomonas eutropha, are currently being evaluated in phase 1 and 2 clinical trials. These studies have demonstrated encouraging improvements in EASI and SCORAD scores, although further research is needed to assess their long-term benefits and sustainability.[31,32]

Antimicrobial peptide (AMP)-based treatments

Patients with AD also exhibit reduced production of AMPs, leading to increased susceptibility to infections. Indolicidin, an AMP derived from bovine neutrophils, has been synthesized into omiganan gel, which has both antimicrobial and immunomodulatory properties.[33] Clinical improvement with omiganan gel was mild, with improvement of only 2.5% in BSA, SCORAD, and pruritus, but restoration of the skin microbiome and reduced infection rates were reported.[34] However, due to its limited efficacy in reducing inflammation, it is unlikely to be used as a monotherapy.

Newer emollients and barrier repair therapies

Intensive daily moisturization is an essential component of AD management. Recent advances in non-medicated therapeutic emollients have introduced formulations that not only improve skin barrier function but also offer antipruritic, antioxidant, and immunomodulatory effects.

Key active ingredients

  1. Ceramides: Restore lipid composition and strengthen the skin barrier.

  2. Saponins: Possess anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties.

  3. Bacterial lysates (Aquaphilus dolomiae and Vitreoscilla filiformis): Modulate immune responses and support microbial balance.[35,36]

Vitreoscilla filiformis-based emollients

A clinical trial evaluating a 5% Vitreoscilla filiformis-containing cream demonstrated significant improvements in SCORAD scores and pruritus.[37] Beyond its barrier-enhancing properties, Vitreoscilla filiformis has been shown to exert immunomodulatory effects, helping to prevent disease relapses.

Newer molecules

Many other molecules are being tried in the topical treatment of AD, but the results have not yet been published, and the trials are still ongoing. Their use in the pediatric age group has not yet been established [Table 5].[38-41]

A concise table comparing the topical therapies in pediatric AD according to the European, American, and Korean guidelines, along with the level of evidence, has been depicted in [Table 6].[42,43]

Table 5: Newer molecules under investigation for topical treatment of AD
Drug Mechanism of action
Rovazolac (ALX-101) gel 1.5% Liver X receptor agonists
Atuzabrutinib Bruton kinase inhibitor
Ivermectin Chloride channel agonist
Cyclosporin 5% solution Calcineurin inhibitor
Tofacitinib and Fingolimod JAK inhibitor and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator
Liposomal gel (Cobamamide) Vitamin B12 analogs, nitric oxide inhibitor.
Taurodeoxycholic acid G Protein Coupled Receptor 19 agonist NCT04530643
Lactobacillus reuteri Probiotic
Levagen+/Palmitoylethanolamide Endocannabinoid-like lipid mediator
Zileuton leukotriene inhibitor
Berdazimer sodium (SB414) Nitric oxide donors
Mapracorat (ZK245186) Selective glucocorticoid receptor agonists

AD: Atopic dermatitis, JAK: Janus kinase inhibitors

Table 6: Comparison of guidelines on topical therapies in pediatric atopic dermatitis
Aspect European guidelines American Guidelines Korean Guidelines Level of evidence
Emollients First-line therapy. Recommended daily; newer emollients with anti-inflammatory properties highlighted First-line therapy; liberal use encouraged First-line therapy; recommend generous, and frequent use. Preference for ceramide-dominant products Level 1 (high-quality RCTs and meta-analyses)
Topical corticosteroids First-line for flares. Recommend potency based on body site and severity First-line. Potency adjusted by age and site First-line for moderate-severe AD Level 1
Topical calcineurin inhibitors Used for sensitive areas, both reactively and proactively Recommended for steroid-sensitive areas. Proactive use supported Used for face, neck, and folds. Approved and used proactively. May be considered in mild-to-moderate cases Level 1
Topical PDE4 inhibitors like crisaborole Crisaborole approved in some EU countries. Used for mild-to-moderate AD Crisaborole approved and recommended Approved and recommended for mild-to-moderate AD Level 1
Topical JAK Inhibitors (e.g., ruxolitinib) Recently introduced for ≥12 years. Limited to short-term use Approved for mild-to-moderate AD ≥12 years Ruxolitinib approved for patients ≥12 years with mild-to-moderate AD Level 2 (short-term data)
Age-specific Guidance Conservative use in infants; off-label use with caution Detailed by age. Emphasis on cautious use in <2 years Provides specific age-based guidance. Very cautious use of TCS in infants and young children

AD: Atopic dermatitis, JAK: Janus kinase inhibitors, PDE4: Phosphodiesterase-4, TCS: Topical corticosteroids, RCT: Randomized controlled trial

DISCUSSION

AD imposes a significant physical, psychological, and social burden on both patients and their families. It is also associated with various comorbid conditions, including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, depression, growth retardation, infections, ocular abnormalities, and autoimmune diseases.[44] Historically, the mainstay treatments for AD have been TCS and emollients. Although TCS are effective in managing inflammation and controlling disease flares, prolonged use has been associated with adverse effects, including skin atrophy, telangiectasia, and systemic absorption, particularly in pediatric populations. As a result, TCIs are increasingly utilized due to their more favorable safety profile. TCIs have demonstrated superior efficacy compared to TCS, especially in the long-term management of AD.[45]

Previously, the pathophysiology of AD was not well understood, and its variable clinical manifestations across different age groups made management challenging. The chronic nature of the disease and its tendency to relapse further complicated treatment strategies. However, advancements in research have led to a better understanding of AD pathophysiology, enabling the discovery of new drug targets. These emerging therapies are more selective and individualized, offering improved treatment options with fewer adverse effects.

Despite these developments, comparative studies assessing the efficacy and safety of newer therapies are still lacking. TCS and TCIs remain the most effective and affordable options, with a lower incidence of adverse events when used appropriately. However, the introduction of newer treatments presents challenges in real-world application due to the absence of direct comparative trials evaluating their efficacy, safety, cost-effectiveness, and tolerability.

In this review, we aim to provide a concise summary of emerging topical therapies for AD, focusing on their drug targets, efficacy, and safety profiles. While it is highly unlikely that a single agent will completely replace TCS, the approval of new medications expands the range of available treatment options. These advancements allow for a more tailored approach in the management of AD by improving patient outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Paediatric atopic dermatitis is a chronic, relapsing inflammatory disorder that significantly impairs quality of life and requires long term, individualized care. Emollients, topical corticosteroids, and topical calcineurin inhibitors remain the cornerstone of therapy when used appropriately. Advances in understanding disease mechanisms have led to newer targeted topical agents, including JAK and PDE4 inhibitors, AhR agonists, TRPV1 antagonists, microbiome modulators, and barrier repair emollients. However, large long term comparative studies are needed to confirm their safety, efficacy, and real world applicability.

Ethical approval:

The Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent:

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patients have given their consent for their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript, and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , , . Atopic dermatitis: Pathophysiology In: Management of atopic dermatitis: Methods and challenges. Vol 1027. Germany: Springer; . p. :21-37.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , et al. Current therapeutic paradigm in pediatric atopic dermatitis: Practical guidance from a national expert panel. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2019;47:194-206.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. . Real-world evidence of an emollient device for atopic and contact dermatitis in pediatric to adult patients-data from a post-marketing surveillance. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2022;15:1797-803.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , et al. The efficacy of moisturisers containing ceramide compared with other moisturisers in the management of atopic dermatitis: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Indian J Dermatol. 2023;68:53-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. . The pathogenic and therapeutic implications of ceramide abnormalities in atopic dermatitis. Cells. 2021;10:2386.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , et al. Consensus conference on clinical management of pediatric atopic dermatitis. Ital J Pediatr. 2016;42:26.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , et al. Consensus-based European guidelines for treatment of atopic eczema (atopic dermatitis) in adults and children: Part I. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32:657-82.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , et al. Bleach baths for atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis including unpublished data, Bayesian interpretation, and GRADE. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2022;128:660-8.e9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , . Wet wrap therapy in moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2017;37:123-39.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , et al. Consensus-based European guidelines for treatment of atopic eczema (atopic dermatitis) in adults and children: Part I. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32:657-82.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , et al. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: Section 2. Management and treatment of atopic dermatitis with topical therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71:116-32.e1.6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , et al. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: Section 3. Management and treatment with phototherapy and systemic agents. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71:327-49.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , et al. Delgocitinib ointment in pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis: A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study and a subsequent open-label, long-term study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85:854-62.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , et al. Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib cream for the treatment of atopic dermatitis: Results from 2 phase 3, randomized, double-blind studies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85:863-72.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , . Atopic dermatitis: Tofacitinib, an option for refractory disease. Clin Case Rep. 2020;8:3244-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , et al. Topical tofacitinib for atopic dermatitis: A phase IIa randomized trial. Br J Dermatol. 2016;175:902-11.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dose ranging study to assess efficacy safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of PF-06700841 topical cream in participants with mild or moderate atopic dermatitis. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/nct03903822?term=pf-06700841&cond=atopic+dermatitis&draw=2&rank=1&view=results [ Last accessed on 2025 Apr 11]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Aclaris therapeutics announces positive preliminary topline data from phase 2a Trial of ATI-1777 for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. Available from: https://www.globenewswire.com/newsrelease/2021/06/08/2243460/37216/en/aclaris-therapeutics-announces-positive-preliminary-topline/data-from-phase-2a-trial-of-ati-1777-for-moderate-to-severe-atopic-dermatitis.html [Last accessed 2025 Apr 11]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , . 16089 Safety of ATI-502, a novel topical JAK1/3 inhibitor, in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: Results from a phase 2a open-label trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83:AB170.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , et al. Efficacy and safety of crisaborole ointment, a novel, nonsteroidal phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor for the topical treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) in children and adults. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;75:494-503.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. , , . New and emerging therapies for pediatric atopic dermatitis. Pediatr Drugs. 2019;21:239-60.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , . Difamilast ointment in adult patients with atopic dermatitis: A phase 3 randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;86:607-14.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. , . Revival of AHR agonist for the treatment of atopic dermatitis: Tapinarof. Curr Treat Options Allergy. 2020;7:414-21.e3.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , . Efficacy and patient-reported outcomes from a phase 2b, randomized clinical trial of tapinarof cream for the treatment of adolescents and adults with atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;84:632-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , , , et al. A phase 2, randomized dose-finding study of tapinarof (GSK2894512 cream) for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80:89-98.e3.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , , , et al. Asivatrep, a TRPV1 antagonist, for the topical treatment of atopic dermatitis: Phase 3, randomized, vehicle-controlled study (CAPTAIN-AD) J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022;149:1340-7.e4.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. , . Novel therapeutic approach with PAC-14028 cream, a TRPV 1 antagonist, for patients with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 2019;180:971-2.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , , , , et al. Patients with atopic dermatitis colonized with Staphylococcus aureus have a distinct phenotype and endotype. J Investig Dermatol. 2018;138:2224-33.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. , , . A therapeutic renaissance-emerging treatments for atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol. 2020;100:adv00165.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , , , , et al. First-in-human topical microbiome transplantation with Roseomonas mucosa for atopic dermatitis. JCI Insight. 2018;3:e120608.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , , , , et al. Development of a human skin commensal microbe for bacteriotherapy of atopic dermatitis and use in a phase 1 randomized clinical trial. Nat Med. 2021;27:700-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. . AOBiome's positive results from its phase 2b Trial for both pruritus (Itch) and appearance of atopic dermatitis (Eczema) Available from: https://www.aobiome.com/pressreleases/aobiomes-ceo-president-todd-krueger-featuredin-ceo-cfo-magazine [Last accessed on 2025 Apr 11]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. , . The role of antimicrobial peptides in animal defenses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:8856-61.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. , , , , , , et al. Pharmacodynamic effects of topical omiganan in patients with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis in a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II trial. Clin Transl Sci. 2020;13:994-1003.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. , , , , , , et al. A new Vitreoscilla filiformis extract grown on spa water-enriched medium activates endogenous cutaneous antioxidant and antimicrobial defenses through a potential Toll-like receptor 2/protein kinase C, zeta transduction pathway. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2013;6:191-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. , , , . A cream based on Aquaphilus dolomiae extracts alleviates nonhistaminergic pruritus in humans. Eur J Dermatol. 2017;27:317-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. , , , , , , et al. Effects of nonpathogenic Gram-negative bacterium Vitreoscilla filiformis lysate on atopic dermatitis: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study. Br J Dermatol. 2008;159:1357-63.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Available from: https://vynetherapeutics.com/pipeline-overview/fmx114 [Last accessed on 2025 Apr 11]
  39. Available from: https://www.qurient.com/bbs/content.php?co_id=q301 [Last accessed on 2025 Apr 11]
  40. , , , , . Atopic dermatitis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4:18003.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. , , , , . A comparison of topical corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023;11:1347-59.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. , , , , , , et al. European guideline (EuroGuiDerm) on atopic eczema-part II: Non-systemic treatments and treatment recommendations for special AE patient populations. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022;36:1904-26.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. , , , , , , et al. Consensus update for systemic treatment of atopic dermatitis. Ann Dermatol. 2021;33:497-514.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections