Translate this page into:
Role of moisturizers and cleansers in managing pediatric eczema
*Corresponding author: Priyanka Sangwan, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. priyankadermasangwan@gmail.com
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: Gupta P, Sangwan P. Role of moisturizers and cleansers in managing pediatric eczema. Indian J Skin Allergy. 2025;4:123-9. doi: 10.25259/IJSA_36_2025
Abstract
Pediatric eczema, which is mainly constituted by atopic dermatitis, is a prevalent chronic inflammatory skin condition in children characterized by dry, itchy, and inflamed skin. It significantly impacts quality of life and poses a therapeutic challenge due to its relapsing nature and varying severity. Nonpharmacologic treatments, especially moisturizers and cleansers, are essential components in managing pediatric eczema. Two key skincare categories with significant dermatologic relevance are cleansers and moisturizers, including their role in pediatric eczema. Moisturizers are a vital component of a dermatologist’s armamentarium, yet surprisingly little is written about them, and even less is truly understood. The market is flooded with a wide array of skincare products, many of which lack solid scientific validation. Although often dismissed as mere cosmetics, these products play a recognized role in managing various skin conditions. In today’s dermatological practice, it is essential for professionals to have a thorough understanding of the mechanisms of action, appropriate usage, dosing, and potential side effects. Cleansers may consist of alkaline soaps or milder synthetic detergents, commonly referred to as syndets, which are less damaging to the skin barrier. Syndets tend to cause less skin irritation and dryness, likely due to their lower propensity to denature proteins. This effect is attributed to the charge density of surfactant aggregates that resemble micelles and bind to proteins. This review explores the role of moisturizers and cleansers, highlighting their mechanisms, types, usage recommendations, and impact on disease control and quality of life.
Keywords
Cleansers
Emollients
Humectants
Moisturizers
Occlusive
Pediatric eczema
Syndets
INTRODUCTION
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a long-term, recurring inflammatory skin disorder. Its primary characteristics include persistent skin dryness and episodic flare-ups of itchy eczema, which are interspersed with brief periods of symptom relief. The condition most commonly presents in early childhood, with more than 90% of cases developing before the age of five, significantly affecting both children and their caregivers. Common consequences include disrupted sleep, reduced self-confidence, and frequent school absences. As such, minimizing flare-ups and managing disease activity during remission are essential for maintaining a good quality of life.[1]
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF PEDIATRIC ECZEMA
AD is a complex and heterogeneous skin disease influenced by genetic and environmental factors. Gene-gene and gene-environment interactions contribute to skin barrier dysfunction and immune-driven inflammation, while skin microbiome imbalances may also play a role, contributing to the clinical variability seen in AD.[2] A family history of atopic diseases, especially AD, is the strongest risk factor, with twin studies suggesting a heritability of around 75%, though this may be overestimated.[3] Genome-wide studies have identified 34 genomic regions linked to AD, many involved in immune responses, particularly T-cell activity and Th2 differentiation. However, these account for <20% of the total heritability, suggesting other genetic and epigenetic factors are involved.
The most well-known genetic risk factor is filaggrin (FLG) mutations, which reduce FLG, a protein crucial for skin barrier function.[4] These mutations increase AD risk about threefold, though many carriers never develop the disease. Thus, FLG mutations alone are not sufficient to cause AD. The resulting increased skin permeability and downstream protein imbalances likely contribute to inflammation, though exact mechanisms remain unclear. Copy number variations in FLG also affect FLG levels and AD risk.[5]
Epidermal Barrier dysfunction in AD
In AD, the skin barrier is compromised due to both primary factors, like FLG gene mutations, and secondary factors, such as the itch-scratch cycle or cytokine-driven reductions in structural proteins and lipids (e.g., due to interleukin [IL]-4, IL-13, and IL-33).[6] These changes occur even in seemingly unaffected skin and include higher skin pH, lower water retention, increased irritability, and greater permeability to irritants and pathogens.
At the molecular level, patients show reduced levels of skin structural and tight junction proteins, altered lipid organization, protease imbalance, and abnormal microbiota. Barrier disruption also leads to inflammation through the release of damage signals called alarmins (e.g., IL-1b, IL-25, IL-33, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin [TSLP]), which further promote immune responses and allergen sensitization.[7] This cycle can be initiated by genetic factors (e.g., FLG deficiency) or immune dysregulation, as seen in immunodeficiencies such as DOCK8 or Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome, where inflammation (e.g., IL-31 overexpression) intensifies itch and barrier damage.[8]
Cutaneous inflammation in AD
AD lesions are marked by an infiltration of immune cells, especially CD4+ T cells, which drive inflammation, along with increased dendritic cells such as Langerhans cells – likely due to heightened antigen presentation. These Langerhans cells, more active in lesional skin, extend dendrites through tight junctions to capture antigens – unlike in healthy or non-lesional skin.
Non-lesional skin, though appearing normal, shows mild immune changes such as spongiosis and T-cell infiltration, similar to lesional skin. Both lesional and non-lesional areas show decreased expression of epidermal barrier genes and increased expression of T helper (TH) cell-related genes.
In lesional skin, gene expression changes are more pronounced, especially those related to keratinocytes and TH2 (IL-4, IL-10, and IL-13) and TH22 (IL-22) cytokines. TH1 and TH17 cytokines may also be upregulated in chronic AD, particularly in children and individuals of Asian descent. AD progression appears to involve a gradual increase in TH2, TH17, and TH22 cytokines.[9] Barrier disruption releases alarmins that activate dendritic cells and initiate TH2 responses. While specific T-cell clones targeting these antigens have been identified in lesions, their overall presence is low. T-cell receptor sequencing reveals a highly diverse T-cell population in both lesional and non-lesional skin.[10]
Neuroimmune interactions in itch
Itch is triggered by pruritogens like histamine and transmitted by cutaneous sensory nerves (C fibers and Aq fibers) to the spinal cord. In AD, skin shows increased nerve density and branching, likely due to an imbalance between nerve growth factors (NGF) (e.g., IL-31 and NGF) and repulsion factors (e.g., semaphorin 3A).[11] Artemin, produced by keratinocytes and fibroblasts (and induced by pollutants through the aryl hydrocarbon receptor), contributes to abnormal nerve growth and sensitivity. While histamine, acting through H1R, H4R, and transient receptor potential vanilloid 1, is a well-known pruritogen, other factors are more relevant in AD. These include ET-1, TSLP, and type 2 cytokines (IL-4, IL-13, and IL-31), which signal through TRPA1, IL-4Ra/Janus kinase 1, and IL-31Ra. TSLP and cytokines directly activate sensory neurons. This explains why treatments like dupilumab (anti-IL-4Ra) relieve both inflammation and itch, and why IL-31 blockade (e.g., with nemolizumab) reduces itch but has limited impact on other AD symptoms.[12]
The role of the microbiota
AD is characterized by marked dysbiosis of the skin microbiota, although it remains unclear whether these changes cause AD or result from epidermal barrier defects and TH2-skewed immunity. Staphylococcus aureus colonization is substantially increased in AD patients: Reported prevalence ranges from ~30% to 100% (depending on patient age, disease severity, and sampling methods) versus ~20% in healthy controls. A meta-analysis of 95 culture-based studies found S. aureus on 70% of lesional and 39% of non-lesional skin sites in AD patients, and polymerase chain reaction-based studies confirm that S. aureus abundance correlates with disease severity.[13] Commensal skin microbes normally suppress S. aureus, and epidemiological studies indicate that early colonization by other Staphylococcus species (detected at ~2 days of age) may protect against later development of AD.[14] S. aureus produces numerous virulence factors implicated in both superficial and invasive infection; many of these factors exacerbate AD by acting on keratinocytes and immune cells in vitro and in vivo (for example, in human skin biopsies and murine models). In addition to S. aureus, other microbes such as Malassezia yeasts (formerly Pityrosporum spp.) likely contribute significantly to AD pathogenesis, for example, by directly inducing skin inflammation.[15]
Now, we will discuss the various types of moisturizers and cleansers in detail, along with their evidence and recommendations in pediatric eczema.
WHAT ARE MOISTURIZERS: THEIR MECHANISM AND VARIOUS TYPES
Moisturizers are non-aqueous emollients (which help soften the skin), occlusive agents (which form a physical barrier to help retain moisture), and humectants (which attract water) and are commonly used and offer several benefits when applied daily [Table 1]. These benefits include improved skin barrier function, reduced signs and symptoms of AD, and decreased reliance on topical corticosteroids (TCSs).[16] Daily use of emollients has also been shown to reduce the risk of developing AD in high-risk infants – those with at least one first-degree relative affected by an atopic condition.[17] Some prescription emollient products, which include barrier-enhancing ingredients such as glycyrrhetinic acid, ceramides, or palmitoylethanolamide, have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration through the 510 (k) medical device clearance pathway. This pathway involves a less stringent review process than that used for drug approvals and is based on the claim that these products support skin barrier function. However, due to a lack of robust head-to-head comparison trials, there is no clear evidence that these approved products are more effective than more affordable, over-the-counter alternatives. As a result, the decision on which moisturizer to use is typically left to the discretion of the patient and their healthcare provider.[18]
| Class | Emollients | Humectants | Occlusives | Protein rejuvenators |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mechanism of action | Saturated and unsaturated variable length hydrocarbons which help in skin barrier function, membrane fluidity and cell signaling leading to overall improvement in skin texture and appearance. Often used in combination with emulsifiers | Mostly low molecular weight substances with water attracting properties into the stratum corneum. Used along with water components to retain the water content | Oils and waxes which form an inert layer on the skin and physically block transepidermal water loss | Small molecular weight proteins thought to help in skin rejuvenation by replenishing essential proteins |
| Indication | Skin dryness, roughness, papulosquamous disorders, and routine skin care | Xerosis, ichthyosis | Xerosis, atopic dermatitis, prevention of contact dermatitis | Skin rejuvenation, aging, photodamaged skin |
| Adverse effects | Rarely contact irritant dermatitis | Irritation (urea, lactic acid) | Messy to apply, cosmetically unacceptable. Folliculitis (mineral oil), acneiform eruptions, contact dermatitis (lanolin) | Contact dermatitis |
| Examples | Cholesterol, squalene, fatty acids, fatty alcohols, pseudoceramides | Glycerol, propylene glycol, panthenol, sorbitol, urea, alpha hydroxy acids, hyaluronic acid | Petrolatum, beeswax, mineral oil, silicones, lanolin, zinc oxide | Collagen, elastin, keratin |
They are classified based on their primary components:[19]
Humectants
Humectants are hygroscopic compounds that draw moisture from both the dermis and, in humid conditions, the environment. Many also act as emollients. The skin’s natural moisturizing factor – composed of lactic acid, pyrrolidone carboxylic acid, and amino acids – plays a key role in stratum corneum (SC) hydration.[19] Urea reduces transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and irritation; at low concentrations (~10%), it hydrates, while at higher levels (20–30%), it becomes keratolytic. Alpha hydroxy acids like lactic acid boost ceramide synthesis, strengthening the skin barrier. However, humectants can also increase TEWL by pulling water to the surface, so they are often combined with occlusives to prevent moisture loss.[20]
Examples include glycerin, alpha hydroxyl acids (glycolic acid and lactic acid), sodium pyrrolidine, carboxylic acid, propylene and butylene glycol, hyaluronic acid, urea, panthenol, aluminum and sodium lactate, gelatin, sorbitol, and honey.
Emollients
Emollients, primarily composed of lipids and oils, help hydrate the skin and improve its softness, flexibility, and smoothness. They enhance the skin’s lubricity, boosting user satisfaction. The SC contains multilamellar intracellular lipids – mainly ceramides and neutral lipids – which form protective barrier layers.[21] Due to the high cost of natural and synthetic ceramides, pseudo-ceramides are often used as alternatives.[22] Lipophilic compounds such as cholesterol and ceramides are commonly included in topical creams, often within liposomes, to improve skin texture. Nano-encapsulated tri-ceramides further enhance skin hydration.[23] Essential fatty acids – such as stearic, linoleic, oleic, and lauric acids – naturally found in oils such as palm, coconut, and wool fat, support skin barrier function and influence cellular processes. Emollients can be further classified into dry, fatty, astringent, and protective emollients. Examples include cholesterol, squalene, fatty acids, fatty alcohols, and pseudoceramides.
Occlusives
Occlusives are substances that form a hydrophobic barrier on the skin to prevent TEWL, especially effective on slightly damp skin. These mainly include oils that integrate into the skin’s lipid matrix.[20] Key occlusives include mineral oil (liquid paraffin) and petrolatum, both petroleum-derived hydrocarbons refined for stability and long shelf life. Petrolatum, though greasy, is highly effective – resisting water loss 170 times better than olive oil and reducing TEWL by over 98% at just 5% concentration. Other occlusives such as lanolin, mineral oil, and silicones offer moderate protection (20–30%). Downsides include greasiness, odor, and potential for allergic reactions.[24]
Examples include petrolatum, paraffin, mineral oil, caprylic triglyceride, squalene, lanolin acid, stearic acid, cetyl alcohol, stearyl alcohol, lanolin lecithin, propylene glycol, cholesterol, beeswax, lanolin, and stearyl stearate.
Different formulations are available depending on skin type and extent of xerosis including creams which are thick and rich (oil-in-water or water-in-oil) and suited for dry to very dry skin, lotions which are lighter in texture than creams (higher water content) and can be used for normal to slightly dry or oily skin, and gels which are lightweight, water-based and are often oil-free, these are suited for oily and acne-prone skin, which are very thick and greasy (high occlusive content) so suited for severely dry, cracked, or damaged skin.
ROLE OF MOISTURIZERS IN PEDIATRIC ECZEMA
The literature on AD treatment supports a strong recommendation for moisturizer use based on moderate certainty evidence. Moreover, moisturizers are generally safe, with rare serious adverse effects.[25] An analysis of 5 moisturizer studies (including 500 patients) showed a small reduction in AD severity with the use of moisturizers as measured by the SCORing AD (SCORAD) tool and the eczema area and severity index (standardized mean difference of 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.17–0.85. These studies also noted adverse events to be rare, (ie, mild and cutaneous) occurring in 34.3% of patients in the treatment arms versus 22.1% of patients in the control arms (RR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.01-1.74), and withdrawal due to adverse events is uncommon. Important considerations in moisturizer use include allergenic potential (many vehicles and interventions contain known contact allergens and innumerable ingredients), heterogeneity in formulations and trial data, paucity of data in AD patients with skin of color, and cost.[26-30]
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS AND META-ANALYSES
A review by Van Zuuren et al., on emollients and moisturizers for eczema, concluded that most moisturizers showed some beneficial effects, producing better results when used with active treatment, prolonging time to flare, and reducing the number of flares and the amount of TCSs needed to achieve similar reductions in eczema severity. The authors did not find reliable evidence that one moisturizer is better than another.[18]
Another review concluded that moisturizers are effective at prolonging remission and reducing risk of relapse but may have limited efficacy in improving disease severity and quality of life in pediatric AD.[1]
Barrier function improvement
A study by Simpson et al. found that twice-daily application of emollients in high-risk neonates significantly delayed or prevented the onset of AD.[17]
GUIDELINE RECOMMENDATIONS
National institute for health and care excellence (NICE) guidelines (UK)
Recommends liberal and frequent use of emollients for all children with atopic eczema
Emphasizes the importance of regular moisturization even when the skin appears normal.
European Task Force on AD
Recognizes emollients as cornerstone maintenance therapy in pediatric AD.
World allergy organization
Supports early use of emollients to prevent eczema and possibly atopic march progression.
ROLES OF MOISTURIZERS IN PREVENTION OF ECZEMA
Early emollient use in infants at high risk of AD has been studied for prevention. Studies like the Barrier Enhancement for Eczema Prevention (BEEP) found no evidence that daily emollient during the first year of life prevents eczema in high-risk children and some evidence to suggest an increased risk of skin infections. Another study showed that families with eczema, asthma, or allergic rhinitis should not use daily emollients to try and prevent eczema in their newborn.[31] Another systematic review and meta-analysis concluded that the prophylactic application of emollients initiated in early infancy may prevent AD, especially in high-risk populations and when used continuously, and the authors hypothesized that emollients may delay rather than prevent AD.[32] To conclude, evidence is inconclusive for the prevention of AD in high-risk infants with early use of moisturizers.
Application guidelines
Apply moisturizers immediately after bathing to lock in moisture (“soak and seal” method).
Use liberally and frequently, ideally 2–3 times daily.
Choose fragrance-free, dye-free, and hypoallergenic products.
Cleansers
Skin cleansers are surface-active agents (such as emulsifiers, detergents, surfactants, or soaps) that reduce surface tension on the skin, helping to remove dirt, sebum, cosmetic residues, microorganisms, and dead skin cells by emulsifying them. An ideal cleanser should perform these functions effectively without causing irritation or damage to the skin – instead, it should help maintain the skin’s moisture balance.[33] The practice of cleansing has evolved significantly over thousands of years, transforming from basic skin scraping to a soothing ritual that enhances both skin health and appearance. Similarly, soap – the fundamental cleansing agent – has undergone remarkable changes, now featuring a wide range of formulations and innovative ingredients.
Cleansers can be divided into three basic types:[34]
Soaps
Composed of long-chain fatty acid alkali salts with a pH of between 9 and 10.
Syndet bars
Syndet (synthetic detergent) bars use non-soap surfactants like fatty acid isethionates or sulfosuccinate esters. Unlike traditional soaps, they are not made by saponification and are designed for specific skin-friendly properties. With a neutral to slightly acidic pH, syndets are less irritating, do not form soap scum, and help retain the skin’s natural lipids and proteins.[35] Their higher free fatty acid content also provides moisturizing benefits to maintain skin hydration.[36]
Combars
Composed of an alkaline soap to which surface active agents with a pH of 9–10 have been added. Combars are milder cleansers than true soaps, but induce more thorough cleansing than synthetic detergents.[37]
CLEANSING IN AD
AD is influenced by a mix of environmental, immune, genetic, and pharmacologic factors. Triggers such as soaps, detergents, disinfectants, microbes (like S. aureus), allergens, seasonal changes, and stress can worsen the condition. While keeping the skin clean is widely recommended, there is debate about using regular toilet soaps. Traditional alkaline soaps (pH ~10.2) used twice daily can damage the skin barrier by thinning the stratum corneum and depleting intercellular lipids, potentially increasing bacterial colonization.[38] Since AD patients have sensitive skin with a lower irritant threshold, synthetic cleansing bars are preferred. These are milder and help retain skin moisture, making them suitable for managing dry, atopic skin.[39]
CLEANSERS: ROLE AND RECOMMENDATIONS
There is a growing body of literature examining the role of cleansers in the management of pediatric eczema (AD). The appropriate use of mild, non-soap cleansers is often recommended as part of skincare routines to help manage and prevent flares. Below is a summary of key literature evidence and recommendations:
RECENT CLINICAL TRIALS AND REVIEWS SUPPORTING USE OF CLEANSERS IN AD
Randomized control trial showed that body wash formulae with lipids and zinc pyrithione significantly reduced the colonization of S. aureus, improved microbial diversity, reduced corticosteroid consumption, and showed clinically important improvement from baseline in SCORAD at the end of 4 weeks.[40]
Cochrane review on emollients and cleansers (2017)[18]
Limited high-quality evidence for cleansers, but suggests some benefit in using emollient-containing cleansers over soap. It also highlights the need for more randomized controlled trials on cleansers in pediatric populations.
Guideline recommendations for use of cleansers in AD
American Academy of Dermatology guidelines (2014)[25] recommend non-soap cleansers with neutral to low pH. Furthermore, it advises against harsh soaps, which can disrupt the skin barrier and worsen eczema. Short, lukewarm baths or showers using gentle cleansers followed by moisturizers are preferred.
NICE guidelines (UK)
Recommends using emollient wash products instead of soap for washing. Emollients should be continued during flare and remission periods.[41]
European dermatology forum guidelines (2018)
Suggests the use of syndets (synthetic detergents), which are less irritating than soaps.
Supports the inclusion of mild cleansers in daily care to reduce microbial colonization and irritation.[42]
CONSENSUS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR USE OF CLEANSERS
Non-soap cleansers with neutral to acidic pH, hydrating cleansers that leave a film of moisturizer over the skin surface, and short, lukewarm baths for AD patients
Avoid alkaline soaps and products with harsh surfactants
Use cleansers in combination with emollients for better skin barrier maintenance.[43]
CHALLENGES AND CONSIDERATIONS WITH PLAUSIBLE SOLUTIONS
Product selection can be confusing due to the vast market-caregivers should be given options rather than prescribing a particular product; they should have a choice depending on cost and availability of products.
Cost and availability may influence adherence; again, various studies have failed to show superiority of particular products over conventional moisturizers such as petrolatum and coconut oil, so these can be prescribed wherever the cost of products is inhibitory.
Potential for irritation or allergy to ingredients (e.g., preservatives and fragrances)-prescriber should ensure fragrance free and preferably preservative free products for children with eczemas, with one excellent, readily available, and cheaper product being petrolatum.
RECENT ADVANCES AND INNOVATIONS
Emerging products incorporate novel ingredients such as colloidal oatmeal, niacinamide, and probiotics, offering additional anti-inflammatory and barrier-restoring benefits. Advances in formulation science have led to longer-lasting hydration and enhanced skin compatibility.
CONCLUSION
Moisturizers and cleansers are cornerstone therapies in the management of pediatric eczema. They offer safe, effective, and accessible means to maintain skin barrier function, reduce symptoms, and prevent flares. Ongoing research continues to optimize their use and develop innovative formulations. In the case of pediatric eczemas, education of caregivers is crucial. Demonstrating proper application techniques and providing written instructions can enhance adherence. A tailored, consistent skincare regimen combined with caregiver education forms the foundation of successful long-term management of pediatric eczema.
Ethical approval:
The Institutional Review Board approval is not required.
Declaration of patient consent:
Patient’s consent was not required as there are no patients in this study.
Conflicts of interest:
There are no conflicts of interest.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:
The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript, and no images were manipulated using AI.
Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.
References
- Efficacy of moisturizers in paediatric atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2021;88:22-31.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Determinants of eczema: Population-based cross-sectional study in Germany. Allergy. 2011;66:206-13.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Filaggrin mutations associated with skin and allergic diseases. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1315-27.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Toward a major risk factor for atopic eczema: Meta-analysis of filaggrin polymorphism data. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;120:1406-12.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Filaggrin-stratified transcriptomic analysis of pediatric skin identifies mechanistic pathways in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;134:82-91.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Proteomic analysis of filaggrin deficiency identifies molecular signatures characteristic of atopic eczema. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;140:1299-309.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The extended clinical phenotype of 64 patients with dedicator of cytokinesis 8 deficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;136:402-12.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Distinct behavior of human Langerhans cells and inflammatory dendritic epidermal cells at tight junctions in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;134:856-64.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Targeting key proximal drivers of type 2 inflammation in disease. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016;15:35-50.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a-NAC-specific autoreactive CD8+ T Cells in atopic dermatitis are of an effector memory type and secrete IL-4 and IFN-g. J Immunol. 2016;196:3245-52.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dupilumab treatment in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:130-9.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prevalence and odds of Staphylococcus aureus carriage in atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Dermatol. 2016;175:687-95.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Skin microbiome before development of atopic dermatitis: Early colonization with commensal staphylococci at 2 months is associated with a lower risk of atopic dermatitis at 1 year. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;139:166-72.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fungal protein MGL_1304 in sweat is an allergen for atopic dermatitis patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;132:608-15.e4.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Comparison of parent knowledge, therapy utilization and severity of atopic eczema before and after explanation and demonstration of topical therapies by a specialist dermatology nurse. Br J Dermatol. 2003;149:582-9.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Emollient enhancement of the skin barrier from birth offers effective atopic dermatitis prevention. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;134:818-23.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Emollients and moisturizers for eczema: Abridged cochrane systematic review including GRADE assessments. Br J Dermatol. 2017;177:1256-71.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moisturizers: The slippery road. Indian J Dermatol. 2016;61:279-87.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moisturizers: What they are and a practical approach to product selection. Skin Therapy Lett. 2005;10:1-8.
- [Google Scholar]
- Water barrier function: A cosmetic approach. Indian J Dermatol. 2006;51:297-8.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Dry skin and moisturizers: Chemistry and function (1st ed). New York: CRC Press; 1999.
- [Google Scholar]
- Nanotechnology-based cosmeceuticals. ISRN Dermatol. 2014;2014:843687.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The interference of some substances with the water vapour loss of human skin. Dermatologica. 1971;142:89-92.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis in adults with topical therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023;89:e1-20.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Patient-reported outcomes from a multicenter, randomized, vehicle-controlled clinical study of MAS063DP (atopiclair) in the management of mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis in adults. J Dermatolog Treat. 2008;19:327-32.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- A randomised, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MAS063D (atopiclair) in the treatment of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis. Eur J Dermatol. 2005;15:31-6.
- [Google Scholar]
- Placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, prospective study of a glycerol-based emollient on eczematous skin in atopic dermatitis: Biophysical and clinical evaluation. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2008;21:39-45.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ectoine-containing cream in the treatment of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis: A randomised, comparator controlled, intra-individual double-blind, multi-center trial. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2014;27:57-65.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- A randomized double-blind controlled trial to compare a triclosan-containing emollient with vehicle for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2010;35:e109-112.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Daily emollient during infancy for prevention of eczema: The BEEP randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2020;395:962-72.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Emollients in infancy to prevent atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Allergy. 2022;77:1685-99.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cleansers and their role in various dermatological disorders. Indian J Dermatol. 2011;56:2-6.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cleansing without compromise: The impact of cleansers on the skin barrier and the technology of mild cleansing. Dermatol Ther. 2004;17:16-25.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Personal cleanser technology and clinical performance. Dermatol Ther. 2004;17:35-42.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cosmetics and cosmeceuticals In: Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Rapini RP, eds. Dermatology (2nd ed). Philadelphia, PA: Mosby Elsevier; 2008. p. :2301-2.
- [Google Scholar]
- The use of cleansers as therapeutic concomitants in various dermatologic disorders. Cutis. 2001;68:12-9.
- [Google Scholar]
- Role of mild cleansing in the management of patient skin. Dermatol Ther. 2004;17:26-34.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Skin benefits of moisturising body wash formulas for children with atopic dermatitis: A randomised controlled clinical study in China. Australas J Dermatol. 2020;61:e54-9.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Atopic eczema in under 12s: Diagnosis and management (CG57) Vol 382. Israel: NICE; BMJ; 2023. p. :1538.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Consensus-based European guidelines for treatment of atopic eczema (atopic dermatitis) in adults and children: Part I. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32:657-82.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Expert consensus on holistic skin care routine: Focus on acne, rosacea, atopic dermatitis, and sensitive skin syndrome. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023;22:45-54.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

