Translate this page into:
Neurogenic inflammation and urticaria: Unraveling the mind–skin connection: A comprehensive review
*Corresponding author: Shaimaa Farouk, Department of Dermatology, Cairo Hospital for Dermatology and Venereology, Cairo, Egypt. dr.shaimaafarouk@gmail.com
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: Farouk S, Abdullah AA. Neurogenic inflammation and urticaria: Unraveling the mind-skin connection, a comprehensive review. Indian J Skin Allergy. doi: 10.25259/IJSA_42_2025
Abstract
Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) presents a considerable clinical challenge due to its multifactorial pathogenesis and frequent resistance to standard antihistamine therapy. Among the emerging contributors to its etiology is neurogenic inflammation, a phenomenon whereby sensory nerves release neuropeptides that interact with mast cells, endothelial cells, and immune cells to propagate inflammation and itch. In addition, the role of psychological stress in modulating neuroimmune responses through the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis underscores the importance of the mind–skin connection in CSU. This review aims to provide a comprehensive exploration of neurogenic inflammation in urticaria, including mechanisms, clinical evidence, potential biomarkers, and therapeutic implications. It also outlines a methodological framework for future research in this domain.
Keywords
Chronic spontaneous urticaria
Mast cells
Mind-skin axis
Neurogenic inflammation
Psychodermatology
INTRODUCTION
Urticaria is a common dermatosis characterized by the development of transient, pruritic wheals and/or angioedema. While acute urticaria often has identifiable triggers, chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), defined as lasting more than 6 weeks, is idiopathic in nature in up to 40% of cases.[1] The classical paradigm emphasizes the centrality of mast cell degranulation and histamine release. However, many patients remain refractory to antihistamines, suggesting that other mediators – particularly neuropeptides – may contribute to disease activity.[2]
Neurogenic inflammation, involving the bidirectional interplay between sensory nerves and the immune system, has gained attention as a contributing factor in urticaria pathogenesis.[3] Furthermore, the significant exacerbation of urticaria by psychological stress highlights a role for the central nervous system and systemic neuroendocrine axes in modulating cutaneous immune responses.[4]
This review integrates current understanding of neurogenic inflammation and the mind–skin axis in urticaria and provides a methodological framework to investigate these mechanisms further.
METHODOLOGY
This review was conducted following a systematic approach. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were searched for relevant literature up to April 2025 using the keywords: Neurogenic inflammation, urticaria, substance P (SP), mast cells, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), stress, psychodermatology, and CSU.
Inclusion criteria
The selection criteria included original studies, clinical trials, reviews, and case series published in English. These studies involved human subjects or relevant in vivo or in vitro models. In addition, the articles focused on neuropeptides, nervous system involvement, or psychoneuroimmunology in urticaria.
Exclusion criteria
Articles that are not related to urticaria or do not discuss neurogenic or psychoneuroimmune mechanisms, as well as letters to the editor or opinion pieces without data, were excluded. A total of 142 articles were screened, and 78 were included in this review based on relevance and quality. Reference lists of included studies were also manually screened to identify additional sources.
THE CUTANEOUS NERVOUS SYSTEM AND NEUROGENIC INFLAMMATION
The skin is not only a barrier organ but also a richly innervated neuroimmunological interface. It hosts a dense network of sensory afferents, autonomic fibers, and neuroendocrine cells, capable of secreting neuropeptides such as SP, CGRP, VIP, and neurokinin A.[5,6]
These neuropeptides are stored in vesicles and released on neuronal activation due to mechanical, thermal, chemical, or inflammatory stimuli. Their release triggers vasodilation, plasma extravasation, immune cell recruitment, and mast cell degranulation—a constellation of features mirroring urticaria lesions[7] [Figure 1].

- This flowchart outlines the psychoneuroimmunological pathway linking psychological stress to urticaria exacerbation. It illustrates how stress activates the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, leading to corticotropin-releasing hormone and cortisol release, mast cell activation, and neurogenic inflammation. CSU: Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria, HPA: Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal axis, CRH: Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone, CRHR1: Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor 1.
Mast cells, which are central to urticaria pathophysiology, are situated adjacent to cutaneous nerve fibers. They express receptors for SP neurokinin-1 receptor (NK1R), VIP, and CGRP, positioning them as targets for neurogenic signaling.[8]
KEY NEUROPEPTIDES IN URTICARIA
SP
SP is a member of the tachykinin family and a key mediator of neurogenic inflammation. It is synthesized in dorsal root ganglia and released from C-fiber nerve endings.
Actions of SP
Activation of NK1R on mast cells leads to the release of histamine, tryptase, and cytokines. This process enhances vascular permeability and induces the chemotaxis of neutrophils and eosinophils. In addition, it is pruritogenic through the activation of Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) channels.[9]
CSU patients have been shown to exhibit increased expression of SP in lesional skin and higher circulating SP levels.[10] Moreover, SP can synergize with immunoglobulin E (IgE) receptor stimulation to enhance mast cell responsiveness.[11]
CGRP
CGRP is a 37 aminoacid neuropeptide released from both sensory and sympathetic nerves. Although its role in CSU is less well defined than SP, CGRP induces vasodilatation and synergizes with SP to potentiate plasma extravasation. It also promotes nitricoxide production and modulates Tcell and dendriticcell function. Elevated CGRP levels have been reported in patients with chronic itch, but further studies are needed to clarify its contribution to urticaria.[12]
VIP
VIP is a neuropeptide with potent immunomodulatory effects. It stimulates cyclic AMP production in mast cells, enhancing histamine release in some settings. VIP also increases interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) production, and modulates T-cell polarization toward a Th2 phenotype.[13]
Key cytokines and mediators
In addition to neuropeptides, several cytokines and mediators are critical in CSU pathophysiology. IL6 and TNFα drive inflammatory cell recruitment and amplify vascular permeability. IL31, often elevated in chronic itch disorders, directly enhances pruritus by acting on cutaneous sensory neurons. IL4 and IL13 promote Th2 skewed immune responses, fostering a proallergic environment. Tryptase and histamine released from mast cells sensitize peripheral nerve endings, while nerve growth factor (NGF) supports neuronal hyperplasia and increases neuropeptide release. Collectively, these mediators form a complex signaling network bridging immune and neuronal pathways, perpetuating chronic inflammation and pruritus in CSU.
MAST CELLS AS NEUROIMMUNE EFFECTORS
Mast cells are key effector cells in CSU, conventionally activated through Immunoglobulin E (IgE) – high-affinity Fc epsilon receptor I (FcεRI) crosslinking. However, they can also be activated by acetylcholine from autonomic nerves. Neuropeptides such as SP and VIP, along with neurotrophins including NGF, play critical roles in the modulation of neural function. In addition, corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), released as part of the stress response, exerts a significant influence on neuronal activity. Acetylcholine, derived from the autonomic nervous system, further contributes to the regulation of physiological processes within the nervous system. Collectively, these molecules are integral to neurochemical signaling and neurophysiological adaptation.
Mast cell–neuron and gut–brain–skin cross-talk
Mast cells and sensory neurons communicate bidirectionally through neuropeptides, cytokines, and receptors, creating a selfperpetuating inflammatory loop that sustains CSU symptoms. Neuronal release of SP, CGRP, and other mediators directly activates mast cells, while mast cell products such as histamine and tryptase sensitize peripheral nerves. In addition, the gut microbiota influences systemic immune responses and neuroendocrine pathways, forming a gut–brain–skin axis that modulates inflammation, pruritus perception, and treatment response in CSU.[14,15]
Histological studies of urticarial lesions have revealed increased proximity of mast cells to nerve fibers and overexpression of neuropeptide receptors in affected skin.[16]
THE ROLE OF STRESS: THE MIND-SKIN AXIS
Stress as a trigger and amplifier
Psychological stress is a well-established trigger and exacerbating factor in CSU. Stressful life events precede the onset or worsening of symptoms in up to 50% of patients.[17] Mechanistically, the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis plays a pivotal role in the neuroendocrine stress response, primarily through the secretion of CRH and subsequent production of cortisol. Concurrently, the sympathetic–adrenal–medullary axis mediates the rapid autonomic response by releasing catecholamines, specifically norepinephrine and epinephrine. Together, these systems orchestrate a coordinated physiological adaptation to stressors, influencing numerous central and peripheral processes relevant to neural function and systemic homeostasis.
These stress mediators also impact immune function, skin barrier integrity, and neuropeptide expression.[5]
CRH and mast cells
CRH, released both systemically and locally in the skin, can directly activate mast cells. CRH receptor 1 is expressed on dermal mast cells and keratinocytes. CRH-mediated mast cell activation has been implicated in both neurogenic inflammation and psychodermatoses [Figure 2].[6]

- A diagram depicting the role of neurogenic inflammation in chronic spontaneous urticaria. CGRP:Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide.
Functional neuroimaging
Neuroimaging studies in patients with CSU have consistently demonstrated altered functional activation within key brain regions implicated in the modulation of sensory and affective processing. Notably, aberrant activity has been observed in the anterior cingulate cortex, insular cortex, and amygdala. These findings suggest a dysregulated neural network potentially underlying the heightened pruritic perception and emotional distress associated with CSU, thereby providing a neurobiological substrate that may inform targeted therapeutic interventions.
These areas are involved in itch, stress, and emotion processing, supporting the CNS’s role in modulating urticaria severity.[14]
NEUROGENIC PRURITUS: PERIPHERAL AND CENTRAL SENSITIZATION Peripheral sensitization
Repeated neuropeptide release lowers the activation threshold of nociceptors. This leads to exaggerated responses to otherwise non-pruritic stimuli (alloknesis) and prolonged itch sensation.[15]
Central sensitization
Sustained peripheral input leads to increased excitability of spinal and supraspinal neurons. Functional changes in pruritus-processing pathways, including glutamate receptor upregulation and altered inhibitory circuits, result in chronic itch perception independent of skin lesions.[18]
CLINICAL EVIDENCE LINKING NEUROGENIC INFLAMMATION TO URTICARIA
Several studies have consistently demonstrated elevated levels of SP and NGF in both the serum and skin of patients with CSU. In addition, increased expression of the NK1R has been observed in lesional skin, correlating with disease activity. Histopathological analyses further reveal a significantly higher nerve fiber density in skin biopsies obtained from CSU patients compared to control subjects, suggesting a neurogenic component in the pathophysiology of chronic urticaria.[10,19]
Omalizumab, though primarily acting through IgE neutralization, also appears to reduce neuropeptide levels and mast cell–nerve interactions, suggesting a neuroimmune-modulating effect.[2]
THERAPEUTIC IMPLICATIONS
Non-sedating H1-antihistamines remain the first-line therapy for CSU. In cases where symptoms persist, omalizumab (an anti-IgE monoclonal antibody) is the next recommended option. For patients unresponsive to these treatments, cyclosporine may be considered as an additional step in management.
In treatmentrefractory cases (defined as persistent disease despite optimized antihistamine use and, where applicable, inadequate response to omalizumab), targeting neurogenic inflammation offers promising options. NK1R antagonists such as aprepitant and serlopitant have demonstrated efficacy in reducing pruritus. Botulinum toxin, by inhibiting neuropeptide release, provides localized symptom relief. Investigational therapies, including Transient Receptor Potential (TRP) channel antagonists, aim to interrupt pruritus signaling pathways. Stress-reduction interventions, such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and mindfulness, are also beneficial for improving quality of life.
NK1R antagonists
Aprepitant and serlopitant, initially developed as antiemetics, have shown benefit in chronic pruritus through NK1R blockade. Trials in CSU patients show modest but significant pruritus reduction.[6]
Botulinum toxin
By inhibiting acetylcholine and neuropeptide release, intradermal botulinum toxin reduces pruritus and wheal formation in localized urticaria and cholinergic urticaria.[17]
Stress management
CBT, relaxation training, and mindfulness have demonstrated efficacy in reducing urticaria flares, improving quality of life, and reducing antihistamine use.[11]
Targeting TRP channels
TRPV1 and Transient Receptor Potential Ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) channels on sensory nerves mediate neuropeptide release and pruritus. Antagonists of these channels are under investigation for chronic itch disorders.[9]
RESEARCH GAPS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Biomarkers
Quantification of SP, CGRP, and NGF levels in both skin tissue and serum represents a promising approach for the identification of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in neuroinflammatory and neuropathic conditions. Furthermore, advanced imaging techniques that elucidate the spatial relationship between mast cells and nerve fibers provide critical insights into the pathophysiological mechanisms underpinning neuroimmune interactions. The assessment of mast cell–nerve proximity through high-resolution microscopy may augment the interpretative value of neuropeptide quantification, thereby enhancing the accuracy of disease characterization and informing therapeutic decision-making.
Personalized medicine
Using neuropsychological profiling to predict treatment response with special concern for genetic polymorphisms in NK1R or TRP channels.
Novel therapies
Include dual H1/NK1R antagonists, CRH receptor antagonists, and gut–brain–skin axis modulators.
CONCLUSION
Neurogenic inflammation and psychoneuroimmunological mechanisms are central to the pathophysiology of urticaria, particularly in refractory or stress-exacerbated cases. Understanding the interplay between the nervous system, mast cells, and psychological factors allows for more targeted and holistic approaches to management. Integrating neuroimmune interventions alongside traditional therapies holds promise in improving outcomes in chronic urticaria.
Ethical approval:
Institutional Review Board approval is not required.
Declaration of patient consent:
Patient’s consent not required as there are no patients in this study.
Conflicts of interest:
There are no conflicts of interest.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:
The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript, and no images were manipulated using AI.
Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.
References
- Pathophysiology of pruritus in atopic dermatitis: An overview. Exp Dermatol. 2002;11:12-24.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neuropeptides activate human mast cell degranulation and chemokine production. Immunol Rev. 2007;217:186-93.
- [Google Scholar]
- Neuronal control of skin function: the skin as a neuroimmunoendocrine organ. Physiol Rev. 2006;86:1309-79.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neurophysiological, neuroimmunological, and neuroendocrine basis of pruritus. J Invest Dermatol. 2006;126:1705-18.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Substance P is upregulated in the skin of patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria. Br J Dermatol. 2021;185:1113-21.
- [Google Scholar]
- Mast cells and inflammation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1822:21-33.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Substance P-induced mast cell activation is augmented in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria. Br J Dermatol. 2008;158:919-25.
- [Google Scholar]
- Bradykinin is a potent pruritogen in atopic dermatitis: A switch from pain to itch. Pain. 2006;126:16-23.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The neuroimmune axis of stress: From HPA axis to microbiome. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:1924.
- [Google Scholar]
- Is there a role for mast cells in psoriasis? Arch Dermatol Res. 2008;300:461-78.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CNS activation in urticaria patients: A functional MRI study. Acta Derm Venereol. 2019;99:798-803.
- [Google Scholar]
- The role of TRP channels in itch and other skin disorders. Semin Immunopathol. 2022;44:597-610.
- [Google Scholar]
- Antipruritic treatment with the NK1 receptor antagonist aprepitant: A case series of 20 patients. Br J Dermatol. 2010;163:610-2.
- [Google Scholar]
- Relationship between chronic stress and chronic urticaria. J Psychosom Res. 2008;64:619-23.
- [Google Scholar]
- Neuro-immuno-psychological aspects of chronic urticaria. J Clin Med. 2023;12:3134.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Relationship between anger and pruritus perception in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria and psoriasis. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. JEADV. 2008;22:1062-9.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leonard Nimoy has passed away at age 83. 2015. IFLScience. Available from: https://www.iflscience.com/space/leonard-nimoy-has-passed-away-age-83 [Last accessed on 2018 Oct 30]
- [Google Scholar]

